Français

Community & Urban Safety Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit

Dashboard Considerations

Dashboards can be powerful tools for tracking progress, supporting collaborative decision‑making, and communicating results to leadership, partners, and communities. Choosing the right tool depends on a team’s goals, data maturity, capacity, and budget. The considerations below can be used to guide decision-making.

This will be treated as a living resource that can evolve as the CCFSC team continues to expand our practice. The original focus was on shared lessons discussed within the CUSM project‘s Community of Practice. Please feel free to reach out if you think there are core themes we’ve missed or misrepresented. 

Summary

Most widely used business intelligence tools

  • Power BI — General‑purpose BI widely used in organizations already using Microsoft 365.
  • Tableau — Industry-leading tool for complex visualizations and deep data exploration, requiring decent analytics expertise.
  • ArcGIS Dashboards (Esri) — Purpose‑built for spatial storytelling; widely used in municipal, public safety, and community planning contexts.

Sector‑specific planning and performance tools

  • Envisio — Designed for public sector strategic planning, KPIs, performance reporting, and council/board dashboards.

Other tools sometimes used in government, nonprofits, or research

  • Qlik Sense, Looker, IBM Cognos, Sisense, Domo — Appropriate when organizations have specialized needs (e.g., embedded dashboards, enterprise-scale data warehousing, or advanced analytics).

Key Differences Across Tools

When comparing dashboard platforms, consider these questions:

  • Analytics capability: What level of analysis do you need: simple trend lines or predictive modelling?
  • Customization of visuals: Do you need standard charts or highly polished, interactive designs?
  • Data size and complexity: What is the scope of data sets?
  • Integration with existing systems: What existing systems does your org use that might influence pricing or connectivity with chosen tools?
  • AI features: Is it important to be able to leverage AI features (e.g., automated insights, natural language queries, forecasting)?
  • Cost and licensing model: What’s the budget and will this be considered per user or org-wide? What are your organizations’ risk tolerance levels with changing license costs?
  • Ease of use: Is it important that mostly non-technical staff can use the tools, or will mostly specialists be involved?
  • Governance & security: How do key policies or considerations around privacy, storage, access, etc. align with policies for the different tools?

When to Choose Each Tool

Power BI

  • Microsoft ecosystem integration: Your organization already uses Microsoft 365 tools (Azure, Teams, SharePoint).
  • Cost-effectiveness: You need strong BI capabilities with lower licensing costs.
  • Self-service dashboards: You want staff to be able to build or update dashboards without specialist skills.

Power BI fits most small/medium CSWB teams because it balances cost, capability, and ease of adoption.

Tableau

  • Advanced visualization: You need highly polished, flexible, or interactive visual storytelling.
  • Deep data exploration: Your team needs to explore trends, relationships, or geospatial patterns in detail.
  • Technical capacity: You have data analysts or staff trained in advanced BI tools with steeper learning curves.
  • Diverse data: You rely on many different data sources or require sophisticated blending.

Tableau is often the best fit for data-rich organizations and evaluation teams that care about design quality.

ArcGIS Dashboards

  • Placebased analysis: Your CSWB work relies on mapping neighbourhood conditions, community assets, environmental factors, or hotspot trends using location‑based indicators.
  • Surveyintegrated workflows: You collect or manage geographically tagged data through tools like Survey123.

ArcGIS Dashboards excel when place, environment, or spatial inequities are core to your project.

Envisio

  • Monitoring of strategic plans: You are monitoring CSWB plans, municipal strategies, KPIs, or performance measures.
  • Project management: You need to track actions, timelines, owners, and progress across multiple initiatives.
  • Structured reporting: Your primary need is organizational performance reporting—not deep data analytics.

Other Tools

Other tools (e.g., Qlik Sense, Looker, Looker Studio, Cognos, Sisense, IBM Cognos Analytics, SAP Analytics/SAP BusinessObjects BI Suite, Domo) might be worth considering if:

  • Your dashboarding strategy sits within a larger enterprise data strategy
  • You anticipate enterprise‑level scaling or extremely large datasets
  • You need embedded dashboards inside your own software or websites
  • You have specialized IT support or unique architecture requirements
  • Qlik Sense — Self‑service BI and data discovery with an associative in‑memory engine, allowing flexible ad‑hoc exploration and slicing/dicing of large datasets.
  • Looker — Cloud‑native enterprise BI with a unified semantic layer, strong data governance, and tight integration with Google Cloud and BigQuery.
  • Looker Studio — Free, lightweight dashboard tool useful for public reporting and simple visualizations, especially if using Google services.
  • Sisense — Strong for embedded analytics, custom applications, and large‑scale BI deployments requiring integrated dashboards inside portals or internal systems.
  • IBM Cognos Analytics — Enterprise‑grade BI and reporting designed for robust governance, scalable reporting, and historical/complex enterprise reporting needs.
  • SAP Analytics Cloud / SAP BusinessObjects BI Suite — Used by organizations already operating within the SAP ecosystem; strong for planning, enterprise reporting, and data governance.
  • Domo — Cloud‑based BI with strong collaboration features, real‑time data ingestion, and broad connector options, useful for teams needing rapid dashboard deployment.

Questions to Help Dashboard Selection

If your organization has used dashboards before

  • Which software did you use, and why was it selected?
  • What were the strengths and limitations?
  • How easy or difficult was it to update or maintain?
  • What worked well for communicating results? What created challenges (e.g., data quality, capacity, licensing)?

If your organization has not used dashboards before

  • What decisions do we want dashboards to support?
  • Who are the primary users (internal staff, leadership, council, public)?
  • Do we have reliable data sources? If not, what’s needed to get there?
  • How will dashboards align with our CSWB goals, indicators, and reporting needs?